In a competitive market with no other market failures, firms ignore uncompensated pollution harm. Why is output above the socially efficient level?
A factory pays its production costs but leaves damage from its river pollution uncompensated. How do private and social costs compare?
Why might a town use taxes to fund street lighting that passers-by can use without paying?
A family benefits from patrols paid for by its neighbours but chooses not to contribute. What is the family doing?
A town enforces a cap on dumping equally harmful units of one pollutant. Firms have different cleanup costs and can freely trade permits. What does this tool do?
Unpaid pollination benefits a neighbouring orchard. No private payment agreement is possible, and beekeeping is below the socially efficient level. Which policy could encourage more beekeeping?
A town chooses pollution charges to make all factories account for their harm. It fines one factory once but leaves the others' dumping uncharged. What is missing from this plan?
In a competitive model with no other market failures, excess pollution caused by unpriced harm occurs because every polluter already bears the full social cost.
Circle one: True False