A coding sequence reads ATG CAA GGT. End joining deletes CAA, exactly three bases. What follows?
After Cas9 makes a break, what shapes the repaired DNA sequence?
A delivery-marker signal alone proves that the intended target allele was edited correctly.
Circle one: True False
A target base near a Cas9 break is C. Researchers want T there by HDR. Their proposed donor matches both target flanks but still carries C. Which revision supplies the intended repair information?
The same Cas9 and guide yield mainly indels in resting mammalian cells and more donor-directed changes in cycling cells. Which repair difference could explain this?
Two guides cut their intended sites similarly. Only one has a predicted close match elsewhere beside a compatible PAM, with PAM-distant mismatches. All else equal, which warrants more off-target concern?
Providing a matching donor guarantees the intended knock-in in every cell that receives Cas9.
Circle one: True False
No edits are detected at two possible off-target sites using a test that misses very rare events. What limits a genome-wide claim of zero off-target edits?