Independent normal observations have known sigma. A one-sided test compares H0: mu = mu0 with H1: mu > mu0. Keep alpha and the true effect mu - mu0 > 0 fixed. Which change raises power?
What does planned power describe?
For the same fixed test and assumptions, power calculated from the observed effect supplies independent evidence beyond the test result.
Circle one: True False
An unrounded sample-size expression is E = (C / delta)^2, with C > 0 fixed. E = 144 at delta = 3. When delta is halved to 1.5, what is E before rounding?
A large study finds a small effect with a tiny p-value. What helps judge practical importance?
A design has low power for a small true effect. Only its significant estimates are reported. Which concern follows under common sampling models?
For independent normal observations with known sigma, plan an upper-tailed mean test at alpha = 0.05 and power = 0.80. Use n = ceil[((1.645 + 0.842) sigma / delta)^2], where ceil rounds up. With sigma = 10 and positive target shift delta = 2, what n results?
Use n = ceil[(C / delta)^2], where C > 0 is fixed, delta is a positive target effect and ceil rounds up. A replication substitutes an inflated selected estimate for delta. What sample-size risk follows for the smaller true effect?