A diary describes a battle the writer fought in, then guesses at the king's secret plans. How should you split it?
- Trust every sentence equally
- Strong for what the writer saw, weak for the guessing
- Weak for everything, since diaries always lie
Which three facts should you fix first when weighing a source?
- Who made it, when, and for which audience
- How long it is, what colour it is, where it is stored
- How famous it is, how old the paper feels, who owns it now
A one sided source is useless and should always be thrown away.
Circle one: True False
Which sentence shows good sourcing inside an answer?
- This poster is biased and therefore useless
- This poster is old so everything in it is true
- This poster shows what its makers wanted workers to believe in wartime
Two newspapers frame the same strike in opposite ways. What is your best next move?
- Pick the one with the bigger headline and trust it
- Compare their framing, list what each leaves out, and weight each claim
- Average the two headlines into one sentence
An open minded answer names what evidence would change its judgement.
Circle one: True False
Sam writes: this source is reliable, so all its claims are true. What is wrong?
- Nothing, since reliable sources never err
- Reliability is about one claim at a time, so each claim needs its own weighing
- Sources should never be trusted about anything
A general's memoir praises his own plan and blames his allies. A clerk's supply list shows half the shells never arrived. What is the careful conclusion?
- The memoir is strong on the plan failing from missing shells, weak on whose fault it was
- The memoir is perfect on everything because the general was there
- The supply list is useless because clerks never understand battles