What best argues that a gene is a plausible driver?
- High frequency within a single tumour alone
- Recurrence across independent tumours at the same functional sites
- A long gene name that sounds important
What is a driver mutation in a tumour population?
- A neutral change carried along by a dividing clone
- A sequencing error introduced by the machine
- A beneficial change that expands its carrier clone under selection
A mutation found in every tumour cell came earlier than one found in a small fraction.
Circle one: True False
Two mutations nest: mutation A is in all cells, mutation B only inside the A clone. What is the order?
- B came first, then A spread around it
- A and B must have struck at the same instant
- A was the founding lesion and B struck later within that branch
A gene is mutated once at a random spot in one patient. How do you judge it?
- A certain driver because it was observed
- More likely a passenger until recurrence says otherwise
- Proof that selection never acts in tumours
How do drift and hitchhiking apply to a growing tumour?
- Neutral passengers hitchhike beside the sweeping driver clone
- Every mutation in a tumour is selected for growth
- Clones never expand because tissues block all division
A colleague calls a gene a driver from one high frequency tumour alone. What is missing?
- Nothing; single tumour frequency proves selection
- A larger tumour sequenced with a different machine
- Recurrence across patients plus a selection argument for the allele
Resistance explodes weeks after therapy starts. What does clonal structure suggest?
- Therapy created the resistant clone from nothing at high speed
- A rare resistant subclone pre-existed and therapy selected it
- Passengers turned into drivers because the drug watched them