Why are suppressor defects recessive at the cellular level?
- One lost copy always kills the cell instantly
- The remaining good copy still builds a working brake
- Suppressors never suffer second hits
What does an activating oncogene mutation do to growth signaling?
- It locks a growth relay in the on position
- It deletes every growth receptor from the cell
- It freezes the cell cycle permanently
Activating oncogene mutations are commonly inherited through families.
Circle one: True False
A family shows early bilateral tumours across generations. What gene class do you argue?
- An acquired dominant oncogene event
- A harmless variant with no role
- An inherited suppressor or repair defect needing one further hit
Normal tissue shows two marker variants, the tumour only one. What happened?
- The sequencer failed on the normal sample
- Loss of heterozygosity deleted the healthy region
- The patient inherited a third copy
A mutation disables a brake protein completely. Do you predict dominance or recessiveness?
- Dominant, because any mutation is dominant
- Recessive at the cell level, until the second copy is lost
- Neither, because brakes never mutate
Repair gene loss raises the mutation rate without driving growth itself. Why does it still predispose to cancer?
- It directly forces division without signals
- It prevents any mutation from ever occurring
- It supplies raw material that accelerates every later malignant step
A single sporadic tumour carries an activating relay mutation. A colleague calls it inherited. What is wrong?
- Sporadic single tumours fit an acquired dominant event, not an inherited defect
- Oncogenes can never mutate in tumours
- Single tumours always prove inheritance