Which force alone creates brand new alleles?
Which set of conditions keeps allele frequencies constant in the Hardy-Weinberg model?
- Mutation, migration, nonrandom mating, a small population, and strong selection all act together
- No mutation, random mating, no gene flow, a very large population, and no selection
- Migrants arrive and selection favors one allele
Under Hardy-Weinberg assumptions, p squared plus 2pq plus q squared equals 1 describes the no-force genotype-frequency baseline. True or false?
Circle one: True False
Two similarly sized populations exchange migrants every generation. What usually happens over time?
- Both populations lose all variation after a few generations
- Their allele frequencies move toward each other
- Mutation stops completely in both populations
Why can a harmful recessive allele linger instead of vanishing when unaffected heterozygotes carry it?
- It always helps carriers survive better than every other genotype
- Most copies hide in unaffected heterozygotes
- Selection favors every rare allele regardless of its effect
Assuming Hardy-Weinberg conditions and a fully recessive trait, 4 in 100 people show the trait. Type q, the recessive allele frequency.
Answer: ______________
A harmful allele is removed by selection each generation, yet it stays at a similar frequency. Migrants arrive every generation from a population where the allele is common. What could maintain it?
- Gene flow adds copies
- The square-root calculation fails for every recessive trait
- Homozygotes no longer reproduce in any population
In this lesson's model, which statement best compares mutation with gene flow?
- Mutation always changes frequencies faster than migration, regardless of population size and input rate
- Gene flow can never change allele frequencies, even when migrants arrive each generation
- Mutation usually adds new alleles slowly, while enough migrant input can change frequencies faster