What does climate adaptation mean?
- Adjusting how people live to reduce harm from actual or expected climate effects
- Reducing emissions to limit additional warming and future hazards
- Returning damaged services to their previous state after a disaster
Which three factors help explain climate risk?
- Hazard, exposure and the amount of greenhouse gases a country emits
- Hazard, exposure and vulnerability, including coping capacity
- Hazard, national income and the total area within a country's borders
A country with low historical emissions can still face high climate risk.
Circle one: True False
A city moves a clinic outside the flood zone and adds backup power for outages. Which description matches the two changes?
- Relocation reduces vulnerability; backup power reduces exposure
- Relocation reduces exposure; backup power improves coping during outages
- Relocation lowers the hazard; backup power speeds financial recovery
Two towns face floodwater of equal depth and duration. One has fewer homes in the flood zone and better emergency services. Why might it suffer less harm?
- Better services mean the town faces a less intense flood hazard
- Fewer homes in the flood zone means its buildings are stronger
- Fewer homes are exposed, and services help people cope
A farmer uses drought-tolerant crops and buys harvest insurance. How do these measures help in different ways?
- Crops may limit crop loss; insurance supports financial recovery
- Crops reduce drought; insurance reduces farm exposure
- Crops mainly protect income after harvest; insurance protects plants as they grow
An aid fund prioritises unmet need and charges larger historical emitters more. Island A has high unmet need and low past emissions. Island B can fund its own protection and has high past emissions. What fits the rule?
- Prioritise aid to A for unmet need; ask B to contribute more for its past emissions
- Prioritise aid to B for its larger economy; ask A to contribute less
- Split aid equally between islands; set contributions by current need
A mayor proposes cutting emissions but doing nothing to prepare for current flood risk. Which response addresses the gap?
- Wait for lower emissions to reduce flooding before preparing the city
- Shift all funding to flood protection and postpone changes to energy supply
- Add suitable adaptation for current risk while also cutting emissions