Why pick the Lorenz gauge for a radiation problem?
- It freezes time dependence
- It removes all sources
- It gives sourced wave equations
A gauge transformation acts. What stays the same?
- The measured fields
- The gauge condition
- The potentials
Final physical answers must be reported in fields, which never depended on the gauge.
Circle one: True False
A static charge layout needs its potential. Which gauge suits it?
- Lorenz, for propagating waves
- No gauge, potentials are unique
- Coulomb, with its Poisson-like scalar law
You add a gradient to A and match the scalar shift. What happens to E and B?
- Both change unpredictably
- Both stay exactly unchanged
- E stays but B doubles
Two potentials yield identical E and B. How are they related?
- By a gauge transformation
- They must be numerically equal
- By a change of units
Two gauges give different intermediate potentials but one shared E. What do you trust?
- The Lorenz intermediate, always
- The shared E, since fields are gauge-free
- Neither until a third gauge votes
A student says Coulomb gauge makes physics instantaneous. What is wrong?
- Coulomb gauge forbids static problems
- Only the description changed; fields still propagate
- Gauges change measured arrival times