A valid level-0.05 test has an actual Type I error probability of 0.03 under its null model. How should this be interpreted?
H0 says a production change leaves the population mean unchanged. The mean really is unchanged, but the test rejects H0. Which outcome occurred?
For a specified true parameter in the alternative, what is the power of a test?
A planned lower-tail test fails to reject H0, although the true population mean is below the null value. This is a Type II error.
Circle one: True False
Two designs use the same target effect and level. Their calculated powers are 0.68 and 0.83. What is the increase in rejection probability from the first design to the second?
Answer: ______________
For the same normal-mean model, sample size and statistic, α rises from 0.01 to 0.05 using nested rejection regions. What is the trade-off?
A treatment study reports p = 0.3 at planned α = 0.05. This result by itself proves that the population treatment effect is exactly zero.
Circle one: True False
A lower-tail normal-mean test uses null mean 100. Hold n, α, population variance and sampling method fixed. The true mean moves from 98 to 94. What happens to power?
At one specified alternative, 400 simulation runs include 64 failures to reject H0. Estimate power as a decimal.
Answer: ______________
A normal-mean test has planned power 0.55 for a target effect. The team must keep α = 0.05, the target effect, population variance and sampling method fixed. Which change can raise power?