From a Gene List to Biology: Enrichment Tests and Their Backgrounds · seed 1 · A4, ink-friendly. The answer key prints on its own page for grown-ups.

Does the background explain your enrichment hit

Science · Genetics & Evolution · ages 23-24
Name ______________________   Date ____________
  1. Which genes belong in the background set?

    • Every gene in the genome
    • Only genes that stood a chance of selection
    • Only the changed genes
  2. What does an over-representation test ask about your gene list?

    • Whether a pathway holds more changed genes than chance predicts
    • Whether each single gene is truly changed
    • Whether the assay measured every gene
  3. Long transcripts tend to attract more reads, so they are called changed more often.

    Circle one:   True   False

  4. A naive test flags mostly long, highly expressed genes. What should you do next?

    • Model each gene's prior chance from length and expression, then retest
    • Drop the long genes and keep the result
    • Report the terms as biology
  5. Your assay measured 12,000 genes but you filtered out 2,000 before testing. What is the right background?

    • Only the changed genes
    • All genes in the genome
    • The 10,000 measured and kept genes
  6. How does a rank-based method differ from an over-representation test?

    • It tests a hard cutoff shortlist
    • It walks the full ordered list and spots pathway members near the top
    • It skips the background set entirely
  7. Using the whole genome as background is fine even when your assay measured only half the genes.

    Circle one:   True   False

  8. A term is significant under one permissive setting but vanishes with a proper background and a rank-based check. What do you conclude?

    • Average the two results and report both
    • Follow it up at once
    • Treat it as a methods artefact, not a finding
LightMySky · lightmysky.comW1-mt_M9eHEXq6iA-s1

Answer key

For grown-ups. Fold this page away before handing over the rest.

Does the background explain your enrichment hit W1-mt_M9eHEXq6iA-s1

  1. Only genes that stood a chance of selection · The background defines chance, so it must match the genes you could have picked.
  2. Whether a pathway holds more changed genes than chance predicts · The test compares the pathway share in your list against random drawing.
  3. True · More fragments per long gene means more chances to look changed.
  4. Model each gene's prior chance from length and expression, then retest · Correction removes the assay bias instead of hiding the genes that carry it.
  5. The 10,000 measured and kept genes · Filtered-out genes never stood a chance, so they must stay out of the background.
  6. It walks the full ordered list and spots pathway members near the top · Ranking sidesteps cutoffs and catches coordinated shifts with no single standout gene.
  7. False · Unmeasured genes never stood a chance, so including them corrupts the chance calculation.
  8. Treat it as a methods artefact, not a finding · Terms that survive only one permissive setting usually do not deserve follow-up.
Worksheet · LightMySky