Here, reproduction means rerunning the original workflow on its original data. Replication means collecting new data for the same question. Which statement uses these terms consistently?
- Reproduction means independent reanalysis; replication means rerunning the unchanged original script
- Reproduction collects new observations; replication reruns the original data and workflow
- Reproduction uses the same-data workflow; replication collects new data
Which handover best supports rerunning a figure?
- Identified inputs, workflow, environment and output checks
- Final plotted values and a plotting command, without the cleaning steps that produced those values
- The current script and a package list, without identifying which input-data revision produced the figure
Supporting computational reproduction requires making identifiable participant data publicly downloadable.
Circle one: True False
A researcher regenerates the expected figure with the original data and workflow. What has this demonstrated?
- The agreement validates the model assumptions used to interpret the scientific finding
- The agreement establishes that the finding will recur when new observations are collected
- The workflow reproduces that output under the checked conditions
An analysis uses randomness and its rerun gives slightly different values. What is a useful first check?
- Edit the output until it matches, without examining the seed or numerical settings
- Compare seeds, settings and the stated tolerance
- Require exact file equality solely because the top-level language version was recorded
Raw sequencing reads may be publicly released. Which deposition plan fits their data type and documentation needs?
- Use a suitable sequence archive and its required metadata
- Deposit only processed summary tables and describe them as the complete raw-read dataset
- Deposit the read files without sample metadata because sequence files alone define every sample
A success_rate value of 0.2 means 20%, but another lab reads it as 0.2%. The code runs. Which documentation would address this misunderstanding?
- A data dictionary defining the column's scale
- An environment file specifying the language and numerical-library versions
- A seed file specifying the random state used to generate the final plot
A README identifies the analysis code only as the main branch. The branch has moved since the figure was made. What information is needed?
- The latest main branch, because using the same branch name identifies the historical code
- The immutable code version used for that figure
- Only the figure's creation date, because dates uniquely identify repository snapshots