Why is the market quantity of a polluting good too high?
- Buyers love dirty rivers
- The firm ignores the outside harm, so its price invites excess buying
- Taxes always raise pollution
A factory fouls a river. How do its private and social costs compare?
- Social cost is higher, adding the harmed neighbours
- Private cost is higher, adding the harmed neighbours
- Both costs are always equal
Why is street lighting funded from taxes?
- Because bulbs are too heavy to sell
- Because it is nonrival and nonexcludable, so sellers cannot charge all users
- Because councils enjoy darkness
One family skips paying for shared patrols that pass anyway. What is this?
- Free riding: benefit without payment
- A positive externality
- A binding price floor
A town caps total dumping and lets firms trade permits. What does this tool do?
- It bans every factory at once
- It pays polluters to pollute more
- It caps total harm while letting cuts happen where cheapest
A beekeeper's hives pollinate the next-door orchard for free. What should follow?
- A subsidy or public support, since the market alone supplies too little
- A tax on the orchard's apples
- A ban on all bees
A mayor fines one dumper and declares the river fixed. What is missing?
- The fine ends all pollution forever
- Every source still needs its harm priced, or the excess continues
- Rivers clean themselves instantly
A river keeps getting polluted because each polluter pays the full social cost already.
Circle one: True False