Why is trying many analyses and reporting the prettiest one wrong?
- Because computers dislike extra work
- Because some path crosses significance by luck alone
- Because only one analysis can ever run
What does a pre-registration fix in advance?
- The hypothesis, exclusion rules, and primary analysis
- The journal, the reviewers, and the publication date
- The font, the margins, and the file name
Pre-registration bans all exploratory analysis.
Circle one: True False
Which study choices belong in the pre-registration?
- Outlier handling, covariates, outcome, and stopping rule
- Office seating, lunch orders, and holidays
- Citation styles and figure colors
You peek at the data and stop on a lucky peak. What goes wrong?
- Nothing; diligent peeking always helps
- The sample size grows automatically
- Nonexistent effects clear the bar far more often than promised
A field publishes mostly striking positives from flexible analyses. What do you expect?
- A literature full of breakthroughs that all replicate
- Mostly circulating noise shaped by selection and hidden flexibility
- The end of all statistical error
You must peek for safety during a trial. What keeps the error rate honest?
- Unlimited unplanned looks with quiet stopping
- Fixed samples, or rules that spend error honestly across looks
- Stopping the moment any subgroup looks good
A colleague forms the hypothesis after seeing the results but writes it as planned. What is this?
- Proper confirmatory testing
- A valid stopping rule
- Hypothesizing after results are known, which mislabels exploration