What does valid mean for a deductive argument?
- Its premises must all be true in the actual world
- Its conclusion must be true in the actual world
- True premises cannot yield a false conclusion
Mara says: since the cafe uses fresh beans, and fresh beans taste better, you will love our coffee. Which claim is her conclusion?
- The cafe uses fresh beans
- You will love our coffee
- Fresh beans taste better
A valid argument always ends in a true conclusion.
Circle one: True False
In a story, the cafe is open, the library is closed and the bus is late. Someone argues: the cafe is open; the library is closed; therefore the bus is late. Why is this invalid?
- The premises do not force the bus to be late
- A true conclusion requires a false premise
- A late bus makes both of the stated premises false
All fish are birds. A salmon is a fish. So a salmon is a bird. Is this argument valid?
- Yes: the salmon must be a bird if both premises hold.
- No: the false fish premise prevents any conclusion from following.
- No: a false conclusion rules out a valid inference.
What must you add to validity to get soundness?
- The conclusion must be long
- All premises must be true
- Extra premises are needed
Which argument is sound?
- All mammals breathe air. All whales are mammals. So all whales breathe air.
- All birds speak English. All crows are birds. So all crows speak English.
- All fish live on dry land. All salmon are fish. So all salmon live on dry land.
If it rains, the grass is wet. The grass is wet. So it rained. Is this argument valid?
- Yes. Wet grass is enough to establish rain.
- Yes. Either premise alone establishes the conclusion.
- No. A sprinkler could wet the grass without rain.