What does valid mean for an argument?
- The premises are all true
- The conclusion is true
- The conclusion must be true if the premises are true
Mara says: since the cafe uses fresh beans, and fresh beans taste better, you will love our coffee. Which line is her conclusion?
- The cafe uses fresh beans
- Our coffee tastes better
- Fresh beans taste better
A valid argument always ends in a true conclusion.
Circle one: True False
Hastings was in 1066, tamaracks are conifers, therefore Paris is the capital of France. All true, yet the argument fails. What is wrong?
- The premises do not support the conclusion
- One of the premises is false
- The conclusion is false
All cats can fly. Mittens is a cat. So Mittens can fly. Why is this argument still valid?
- If the premises were true, the ending would have to be true
- Cats really can fly
- Mittens is a famous cat
What must you add to validity to get soundness?
- A longer conclusion
- True premises
- More premises
Which of these arguments is sound?
- All mammals breathe. A whale is a mammal. So a whale breathes.
- All birds can talk. A crow is a bird. So a crow can talk.
- Fish live on land. A salmon is a fish. So a salmon lives on land.
If it rains, the grass is wet. The grass is wet. So it rained. Is this valid?
- Yes, since both lines are true
- Yes, since wet grass proves rain
- No, since a sprinkler could have wet the grass