An exact mass matches the claimed formula within the stated tolerance. What does that rule out?
- Every possible isomer
- A different formula
- Any impurity in the sample
What does a fully assigned set of proton and carbon NMR spectra rule out?
- A structural isomer
- Any impurity at all
- A wrong isotope ratio
An isolated yield reported with no characterisation counts as a result.
Circle one: True False
Where should the molecular ion peak land for a claimed formula?
- At the mass the formula predicts
- At double the predicted mass, for safety
- Wherever the tallest peak happens to sit
Elemental analysis disagrees with the claimed formula. What does the mismatch say?
- The balance needs new batteries
- The formula is proven by effort alone
- The sample is impure or the formula is wrong
Which procedure line can another group repeat?
- Purify the product until clean
- Silica, 3 to 1 eluent, 10 mL fractions
- Handle with care and hope for crystals
Another group follows your written method and gets a different compound. Where do you look first?
- The missing detail in the procedure
- The brand of their glassware
- The day of the week they ran it
A draft experimental section claims a pure new compound, citing only a yield. Which gaps do you flag?
- Missing adjectives about the product color
- Missing thanks to the funding body
- Spectra, formula proof and a purity method