How do stereospecific and stereoselective differ?
- They mean exactly the same thing
- Stereospecific maps each start to one product, stereoselective merely prefers one
- Stereoselective is stricter than stereospecific
What does a planar intermediate do to the stereochemistry of the product?
- It forces attack from both faces, giving a racemic mix
- It always gives a single enantiomer
- It destroys all atoms in the molecule
Clean inversion at a stereocentre argues for a backside attack.
Circle one: True False
One geometric isomer of starting material gives one product, the other isomer gives a different product. What is the reaction?
- Stereoselective but not stereospecific
- Unrelated to stereochemistry
- Stereospecific
A single enantiomer substrate gives a fully racemic product. What intermediate fits?
- A flat intermediate open to both faces
- A concerted backside attack
- No intermediate at all
A reaction of one enantiomer gives product with clean inversion and no scrambling. What do you rule out?
- A concerted backside attack
- A planar intermediate
- Any reaction at the stereocentre
A student claims speed data alone prove a backside attack. Why is that weak?
- Speed data are always fabricated
- Stereochemistry testifies directly while speed only hints
- Backside attacks have no speed at all
A single enantiomer gives almost racemic product with net inversion. What happened?
- One pure backside attack with no side route
- The starting material was racemic
- Competing pathways: mostly backside attack plus a planar leak