Why do orbits precess in this geometry?
- A wind pushes the planets
- It departs from the inverse-square result
- Clocks tick too loudly
Two clocks sit at different depths. Which ticks slower as seen from far?
- The deeper one
- The higher one
- Both tick exactly alike
The horizon is where the coordinates fail, not the geometry.
Circle one: True False
Light from a far star grazes the mass. What happens?
- Its path bends through the curved region
- It stops and waits
- It speeds past unchanged
How do you compare two clock rates at different depths?
- Ask the deeper clock politely
- Assume all clocks match
- Read both off the metric and compare
What separates the horizon from the singularity?
- They are the same thing exactly
- The horizon is a coordinate breakdown; the singularity is genuine
- Neither exists at all
A report blames orbital precession on a new force. What is missing?
- Geometry alone explains it as departure from inverse-square
- More forces always help
- Precession needs no explanation
A probe crosses the horizon carrying a clock. What does the lesson say about the crossing itself?
- The probe hits a wall
- Time stops for everyone
- Nothing special locally: the geometry stays smooth there