Where do the receptor head and tails come from?
- Head from signaling chains, tails from antibodies
- Head from antibody binding regions, tails from signaling chains
- Both parts from viral coat proteins
What path does engineered T-cell manufacture follow?
- Cells out, gene inserted by vector, product checked, cells returned
- Gene injected directly into the tumour
- Donor cells given with no modification
Poor cell expansion during manufacture is only a logistics problem, not a treatment failure.
Circle one: True False
Why have solid tumours proved harder targets than B-cell cancers?
- They lack a uniform flag like CD19
- Their cells cannot be collected
- Viral vectors cannot enter solid tissue
Swapping the signaling tails changes the therapy. What does it change?
- Whether a vector is needed
- Which marker the cell finds
- How hard the cell fires and how long it survives
Healthy B cells die alongside the tumour during therapy. Why?
- The vector infected them by mistake
- They carry the same marker the receptor head aims at
- The returned cells attack at random
A proposal aims the receptor at a marker shared with vital healthy tissue. What is your verdict?
- Reject the target choice: severe off-tumour hitting is predictable
- Approve it for solid tumours only
- Approve it, since firing can be tuned later
You strengthen the signaling tails for a hotter response. What toxicity should you predict?
- Loss of the antibody head
- Weaker engraftment of the cells
- A greater storm of released cytokines