What does the network predict at each step?
- The noise mixed in so far
- The clean image in a single jump
- The number of steps still to run
What does the forward process need training for?
- Nothing, it is a fixed recipe
- Learning how much noise to add at each step
- Learning which pixels to corrupt first
Generation starts from pure noise and denoises stepwise into a sample.
Circle one: True False
Why is stepwise denoising easier to learn than one-shot image making?
- Each step is a small easy correction
- Noise takes less memory than a full image
- Long loops need no training data
Samples show rough textures and odd speckles. Which fix needs no retraining?
- Retrain with a different noise schedule
- Add more layers to the network
- Run more sampling steps
Generation is too slow for a demo. What do you trade away by cutting steps?
- Nothing, steps are decorative
- The need for any model
- Sample cleanliness
Two configs give equal quality but one uses half the steps. Which ships?
- The slower one, since more steps always mean cleaner samples
- The half-step one, it buys the same quality faster
- Neither, quality ties prove nothing
A student trains the network to output clean images directly from pure noise. What is the conceptual error?
- Networks cannot output images without captions
- Direct jumps skip the easy stepwise structure
- Noise must be added, never removed, during training