Fossils found in deeper, older rock layers are usually simpler than fossils found in layers closer to the surface.
Circle one: True False
How do most fossils form?
- Minerals slowly replace buried bones or shells over a very long time
- An animal instantly turns to stone the moment it dies
- Fossils are rocks that were always shaped like animals
What is a pentadactyl limb?
- A limb that only appears in fish
- A limb built on a five-digit bone pattern shared by many different animals
- A limb with no bones at all
A human arm, a bat wing, and a whale flipper all share the same pentadactyl bone pattern, even though they do very different jobs. What does this pattern most likely show?
- These animals share a common ancestor
- These animals copied each other's body shape by coincidence
- Bones only ever come in one possible arrangement
A scientist digs through rock layers and finds simple sea creatures at the bottom, fish in the middle, and land animals near the top. What does this order suggest?
- The layers formed all at once in no particular order
- Land animals lived before sea creatures did
- Life has changed and become more varied over a long span of time
Darwin found many finch species on the Galapagos Islands, each with a beak shaped for a different food source on its island. What does this pattern suggest?
- Every finch species appeared separately with no connection to the others
- The finches share an ancestor and changed to fit each island's food
- All finches everywhere must have identical beaks
A student claims Darwin's finches on different islands must be totally unrelated species that appeared separately, since their beaks look so different. What evidence best challenges this claim?
- The finches share many body features typical of a common ancestor; beak differences are small adaptations, not signs of separate origins
- Islands cannot support finches, so this evidence doesn't apply
- The student is correct, different beak shapes always mean unrelated species
A classmate says, 'Nobody has ever watched one species turn into another, so fossils can't really prove evolution happened.' What's wrong with that argument?
- The classmate is right, fossils prove nothing about change over time
- Fossils only ever show animals that are still alive today
- The fossil record lets scientists compare life across millions of years, showing change even though no one watched it happen directly