What should you extract from a mathematics paper before reading any proof?
What should you extract from a mathematics paper before reading any proof?
Why run the theorem on an example before touching the proof?
A paper uses compact without defining it but carefully defines tame cover. Compact is assumed background and tame cover is introduced.
Circle one: True False
How do you separate definitions a paper assumes from ones it introduces?
A lemma is cited exactly once in the main proof, to bound an error term. What is the lemma doing for the main argument?
A theorem reads: let f be continuous on the closed interval from 0 to 1. Then f attains a maximum. What are its hypotheses?
A theorem reads: Let f be continuous on [0, 1]. Then f attains a maximum. What are its hypotheses?
The workable route opens the technical machinery before the statement, example, and proof sketch make sense.
Circle one: True False
You open a short paper with one theorem, one example, and two lemmas. What is the correct first pass?