A fictional treaty permits withdrawal after one year's notice. A member gives valid notice today. What does that clause permit?
- It may leave when the stated notice period has ended.
- It may suspend its duties now and complete its withdrawal once the year has passed.
- It may leave after a year only if the other members also approve its valid notice.
A treaty requires ratification and entry into force. State R signs but has not ratified. What follows from these rules?
- Signature completes ratification.
- Signature alone has not activated all its treaty duties.
- Signature activates the full treaty duties, while ratification mainly confirms them for domestic purposes.
The United Nations is a world government with its own standing army that can make every state obey.
Circle one: True False
Under WTO rules, what must an investigation establish before an importing member imposes an anti-dumping duty?
- Dumping, domestic industry injury and a causal link
- Dumping and injury to a domestic industry
- Dumping, injury to domestic industry and an intention to drive rival firms out of the market
A state refuses to comply with a binding international judgment. Which account of the response is most accurate?
- The court must ask the Council to impose sanctions before the duty applies.
- The parties must negotiate again because refusal suspends the judgment's binding force.
- The duty remains; further responses depend on the case.
Several fleets share a fish stock. Why can each fleet's incentive to take extra fish threaten the stock?
- Catch gains and depletion costs both belong to the fleet taking the fish.
- Extra catch benefits one fleet, while depletion costs are shared.
- Catch gains are shared among fleets, while depletion costs fall on the fleet taking the extra fish.
Two states accept ICJ jurisdiction over a border dispute. Which description of the court's powers is correct?
- It can issue a judgment binding those parties, but has no army.
- It can recommend a settlement but cannot bind the parties.
- It can issue a judgment binding all states with an interest in the border, including states outside the case.
Which account correctly matches the two historical cases taught in the lesson?
- The Montreal Protocol reduced ozone-depleting chemicals; the US complied with the Nicaragua judgment.
- The Montreal Protocol did not help reduce ozone-depleting chemicals; the US complied with the Nicaragua judgment.
- The Montreal Protocol helped reduce ozone-depleting chemicals; the US did not comply in the Nicaragua case.