Which of these is a primary source?
- A letter written at the time
- A modern film about the event
- A rumour with no named author
Give two reasons two historians can read the same event differently.
- They always copy each other exactly
- They ask different questions and use different sources
- They never read any evidence at all
What does sourcing a document mean?
- Counting how many pages it has
- Asking who made it and why
- Memorising its date word for word
Old books blamed the plague on bad air; new ones use burial records and DNA. What changed the account?
- The plague itself changed its germs
- New evidence and new questions overturned it
- Historians simply got more stubborn
A book claims the Second World War could not have been avoided. How do you test it?
- State its claim in one sentence and weigh the evidence beneath
- Count the book's chapters and trust the total
- Check whether you like the author's photo
One writer stressing continuity and another stressing sudden change must mean one of them is lying.
Circle one: True False
A friend says historians disagreeing proves nobody knows anything. What is the flaw?
- Archives never open and questions never change
- Disagreement ends all further research
- Tested rivalry is how knowledge moves forward
You argue the war was avoidable, citing two missed negotiations. What earns your case trust?
- Shouting the claim more loudly than rivals
- Hiding every fact that favours the other side
- Admitting the strongest point against you and answering it