What does genetic evidence for a target leave open?
- Whether the target matters in disease
- Whether a drug can reach and modulate it safely
- Whether the gene exists
What question does target validation answer?
- Whether changing the target changes disease and a molecule can reach it
- Which company should develop the drug
- What the drug will be named
Agonists push a receptor while antagonists block it.
Circle one: True False
Chemical validation shows clean modulation in cells. What stays open?
- Whether patients benefit from it
- Whether the molecule binds anything
- Whether modulation is possible
A hit looks great in one well. What is the next honest step?
- Rename it and publish
- Call it a lead and scale up chemistry
- Confirm it in fresh assays with dose response and counterscreens
A candidate is potent and selective but never reaches free levels in tissue. Your verdict?
- Advance it as a medicine
- Treat it as a reagent, not a medicine
- Fix it by raising the dose without limit
High affinity alone guarantees a safe, effective drug.
Circle one: True False
A program has only genetic evidence and wants full chemistry spending now. What do you advise?
- Skip validation and screen broadly
- Spend now; genetics is enough
- Get chemical validation first: reach and safe modulation are unproven