Which task is part of a curator's work on an exhibition?
- Choosing works and explaining them through labels
- Repairing flaking paint with conservation tools
- Setting daily ticket sales targets and cash totals
Which pair names two ways a work can enter a museum's collection?
- Being described in a review and praised by a critic
- Being shown in a photo and mentioned in a lecture
- Being bought by the museum and donated as a gift
In some Western museums, classing work as craft or folk art contributed to its exclusion from fine-art displays.
Circle one: True False
In the hypothetical mask dispute, which argument could a supporter of keeping the object at the museum offer?
- The museum offers care, study and public access
- A large audience proves the source community consented
- Any object kept for many years becomes fairly acquired
In a hypothetical dispute, records show that a mask was taken from a temple without its community's consent. Which argument supports return?
- Keep it abroad because that is where more people visit
- Treat today's display label as proof of a lawful sale
- Return control to the community that did not consent
A period's records list artists A, B and C. A gallery wall about that period shows only A. What can you conclude?
- The wall proves the omitted artists made no work then
- The wall omits artists who appear in the records
- The records must describe people from a different era
Removing a curator's name from labels removes the effects of their selection choices.
Circle one: True False
Records show that a mask was taken without consent. A museum gives visitor totals as its only reason to keep it. Which question best tests that reason?
- Could a new display label make the visitor count much larger?
- Could return allow access while restoring community control?
- Could a higher ticket price establish that consent was given?