Which pair plus palladium calls for a Suzuki coupling?
- Aryl boronic acid with aryl bromide
- Two alkanes with no functional groups
- An alcohol with a ketone
What does ligand bulk do to reductive elimination?
- It squeezes the partners together so it fires
- It stops it completely
- It has no effect on it
A defined precatalyst releases the active species faster than a flask mix of metal and ligand.
Circle one: True False
Oxidative addition is fast but product barely forms. Which step should the next change target?
- Oxidative addition again
- Reductive elimination
- Weighing the reagents
An aryl chloride fails and returns starting material. Which change aims at the fault?
- Less catalyst overall
- A colder reaction
- A bulkier electron-rich phosphine
A flask mix of metal and ligand gives a sleepy reaction. Why would a defined precatalyst help?
- It adds extra unrelated metals
- It removes the need for a base
- It guarantees exact ratio and fast release of the active species
Two fixes are proposed for a stalled chloride: bulkier ligand or stronger base. How do you argue between them?
- Pick randomly, both do the same job
- Ask which slow step each targets and match it to the diagnosis
- Always pick the base, it is cheaper
A student answers every failure with a stronger base. When is that the wrong instinct?
- When the base is already strong
- When recovered starting material shows oxidative addition never ran
- When the solvent is polar