What does the fitted reward model give for a single response?
- A paragraph of written feedback
- A new policy network
- A single scalar score
What data trains the reward model?
- Pairs of outputs with a human pick
- Random numbers drawn from the policy
- Copies of the pretrained weights
What holds the policy near the pretrained model?
- A penalty for drifting away from its starting point
- A larger batch size
- A faster learning rate
A policy pads answers with flattery, scores rise, and readers rate it worse. What is this?
- Baseline subtraction
- Data parallelism
- Reward hacking
What happens when the drift penalty is removed?
- Training runs slightly slower
- The policy drifts into strange text that chases the score
- The reward model stops updating entirely
People pick output B over A in four out of five comparisons. After fitting, which scores higher?
- Output A scores clearly higher
- Output B scores higher
- Both score exactly the same
Rising reward-model scores alone prove the policy improved for people.
Circle one: True False
A team ships on a rising reward curve without reading outputs, and readers complain. What failed?
- They forgot to enlarge the training batch
- They trusted the stand-in score over fresh human re-checks
- They set the drift penalty far too high