Scattering: Cross-Sections and the Born Approximation
A cross-section expresses scattering probability as an effective area. In first Born scattering, the amplitude is proportional to the Fourier transform of the potential at the wave-vector transfer. Measured intensity constrains the potential but does not generally determine it uniquely.
What a learner can do afterwards
- Defines a differential cross-section in terms of counts, beam flux and solid angle
- Relates the Born amplitude to the Fourier transform of the potential
- States when the approximation is trustworthy and what a partial-wave treatment adds
1 · Read
A cross-section is an effective interaction area, not necessarily the target's geometric silhouette. For a uniform beam and a thin target of N independent scatterers, a small angular bin gives dσ/dΩ approximately C/(jNtΔΩ). Here C is the event count corrected for background and efficiency, j is incident particles per area per time, t is exposure time and ΔΩ is the bin's solid angle. Solid angle is the area a direction cone cuts out on a unit sphere. The units are area per steradian.
For nonrelativistic elastic scattering from local V(r), first Born replaces the full wave in the interaction integral by the incident plane wave. With q=k_f-k_i, f_B(q)=-m/(2pi hbar²) integral exp(-iq·r)V(r)d³r. The spatial Fourier transform sums V(r) weighted by exp(-iq·r). Here m is particle mass, or reduced mass for two bodies. The k vectors are wave vectors; momentum transfer is hbar q. In this convention, dσ/dΩ=|f_B|².
Intensity gives |f|² and loses f's complex phase. Limited angles sample only part of the transform, so the potential is not generally reconstructed uniquely. Here patterns are absolute differential cross-sections obtained by dividing corrected counts by jNtΔΩ, not curves scaled to unit total. Different absolute patterns need not imply different spatial shapes: changing the strength of a same-shaped potential can change intensity. Control the experimental conditions.
Suppose C=30, j=50 particles/(cm² s), N=3, t=2 s and ΔΩ=0.5 sr. Divide by jNtΔΩ=150/(cm²) sr to obtain an average dσ/dΩ=0.2 cm²/sr in that bin. Use corrected counts and keep the target and exposure factors. In perturbative scattering, a golden-rule transition rate divided by incident flux gives a cross-section.
For a central potential V(r), expand the wave in angular-momentum channels and solve each radial equation. The resulting partial-wave phase shifts describe scattering without assuming a weak potential. Include enough contributing channels and impose the radial solutions' scattering boundary conditions. Partial waves are not an automatic replacement for every noncentral or multichannel scattering problem.
First Born theory is useful when replacing the interaction-region wave by the incident plane wave changes the result only a little. Strength, range and incident energy all matter; resonances can make a perturbative estimate poor. Comparing a suitable dimensionless parameter, higher Born terms or an exact calculation can test the approximation. A strong-potential result needs a regime-specific check, not more decimal places.
Normalize counts by flux, target number, time and solid angle. Born intensity is the squared magnitude of a Fourier-related amplitude. Check its validity; intensity alone does not fix the potential.
Original lesson, questions and flashcards written for this dataset about scattering cross-sections and the first Born approximation.
2 · Watch
En anglaisTake it off screen
Where it sits
Learn first
This opens up
Nothing builds on it yet.
8 questions wait behind this lesson, each with its answer explained. Every answer feeds the sky: stars light as they are learned, and dim when it is time to come back.