LightMySky
En anglais

Formal Debates

Participate in formal debates and structured discussions. Support a position with reasons and evidence, summarise opposing points fairly, respond constructively, and follow the agreed discussion rules.

No account needed. Progress saves in this browser.

What a learner can do afterwards

  • Present an argument in a debate with a clear claim supported by evidence
  • Respond to an opposing point by summarising it fairly before offering a counterargument
  • Build on a previous speaker’s idea by extending, questioning, or challenging it constructively

1 · Read

You have practised planning a talk for an audience. A formal debate adds discussion of opposing positions under agreed rules. Follow the chair's speaking turns and time limits. A claim states your position; reasons explain why you hold it. Give evidence and explain how it supports your position. If a task gives a checklist, count each completed check once.

Evidence must fit the exact claim. Leak records support considering window repairs; popularity does not show leaks. Check collection methods and what the evidence establishes. Surveys record respondents' answers, not everyone's views or guaranteed future actions. Example counts and source reputation alone do not establish quality. Opinions can show preferences. When opposing evidence holds up, acknowledge it and reconsider the part of your claim it affects.

Records of window leaksConsider window repairs

Explain the connection. Evidence about a problem does not settle every detail of its solution.

Try it together

In an imagined debate, Lina says, 'A school garden could help lessons, but tools cost money.' Noor replies, 'You see a possible learning benefit and a cost problem. Could we borrow tools? We would need to check availability.' Noor keeps both parts of Lina's point and responds to the cost concern. Her suggestion still needs checking.

Tools cost moneyCould we borrow tools?Check availability
Noor's question addresses the stated cost concern. It does not prove that tools are available.

Before replying, summarise the speaker's meaning fairly. Keep limits such as 'may' and conditions such as 'if'; do not turn a possible saving into no cost. Ask for clarification if needed. A counterargument gives a reason to question a claim. Address the stated point, not an unrelated personal trait. A useful question requests a specific missing detail, such as who answered a survey.

Build on an idea by adding a relevant reason, example, practical detail or implication. You can also question or challenge it respectfully. Name the idea and show the connection; a starter alone is not enough. Acknowledge useful opposing evidence and reconsider the part of your claim it affects. You can accept one point while questioning the conclusion. Debate replies have no universal four-move order.

Follow the agreed rules. Support your position, summarise other views fairly, and connect your replies to their reasons and evidence.

Lesson, practice questions and flashcards written for this learning dataset. School situations and reported results in practice examples are imagined.

Four original readings written for this learning dataset, using imagined situations to explain debate preparation and fair responses.

More to read

What does the evidence support?

Imagine a council discussing a roof for its bicycle stands. A speaker reports damage to bicycles left in rain and recommends a shelter.

The damage report concerns a problem the shelter might address. It does not settle the shelter's price, location or design. Those parts of the decision need more information.

Before a debate, write the proposed action beside its reason. Add the evidence beneath that reason. Explain the connection in a sentence. If the reason concerns safety but the evidence concerns popularity, check whether you have answered the safety question.

Keep the limits of the evidence in your argument. An observation can support trying an idea without proving that it will solve every problem.

Questions about a source

A debate speaker says that a poll supports opening a new club. Before treating the poll as the school's view, ask who could answer and who actually replied.

A poll of existing club members may reveal their wishes. It may miss pupils who cannot attend at the current time. The questions matter too: asking whether someone likes music is different from asking whether they would attend a Thursday rehearsal.

Keep a record of the source and its method so listeners can check it. Describe the answers accurately. Interest does not guarantee attendance, and one group's answers do not establish everyone's wishes.

If a detail is missing, request it. Missing information is a reason to investigate, not automatic proof that the reported result is false.

Keep the condition in the summary

In a practice discussion, Ben proposes opening a sports hall at lunch if a supervisor is available. He says this might give pupils more exercise time.

A summary proposing opening at all times changes his plan. Promising improved fitness also goes beyond his words. A fair summary keeps the lunch opening, its possible benefit and the supervision condition.

After summarising, you could ask who would supervise. You could also present relevant information about staffing. Either response addresses the proposal actually made.

Try this with a partner. Summarise a proposal, then ask whether you have kept its meaning. Check conditions and uncertainty before offering your response.

Reconsidering part of a proposal

Suppose you support opening a club every afternoon. Another speaker supplies a staffing timetable showing that supervisors are available on only two afternoons.

Check the timetable and its relevance. If the information holds up, you could narrow the proposal to those two days. Accepting that staffing limit does not require abandoning the club.

Before debating, consider what evidence would make you change part of your position. This helps you respond when a useful objection appears.

A prepared reply is useful only if it addresses the point being made. Acknowledge relevant evidence, explain what it changes and state what you still support. You can disagree with a conclusion while accepting one of its supporting points.

2 · Watch

En anglais

Take it off screen

Print a worksheetA4 with an answer key page for grown-ups. No screen, no internet.

Where it sits

Where this leads

Jobs that lean on this skill. Follow one to see everything it is built on.

Then practise

24 questions wait behind this lesson, each with its answer explained. Every answer feeds the sky: stars light as they are learned, and dim when it is time to come back.

Spotted a problem on this page? Tell us
Formal Debates · English, ages 12 to 14 · LightMySky